Macauly in his studio. |
An image of a suffering person might make us feel sympathetic; but sympathy is an inherently unequal relation between oneself and the other. Sympathy implies a superior state for the one who gives it to the other. It turns the other purely into a recipient, the object of another's actions, whether that other chooses to give aid and assistance or dismiss the object as being the inevitable result of horrible, evil processes at work in the world.
But to give voice is to give agency. It turns those objects of suffering back into thinking, acting subjects. For one thing, as I mentioned above, it explicitly empowers the speaker to choose the words she or he uses to tell her/his own story. The speaking subject decides how to define itself. Second, it creates a window for empathy, rather than sympathy; only individual humans are capable of speech, and speaking words is a reminder to all those that listen that the speaker is a sentient being that is actively interpreting many layers of physical and psychological experience in an attempt to make a connection with others. Speech is the ultimate form of connection - it is meaningless without an other to listen. It is the key to establishing empathetic connections, rather than sympathetic condescension.
Just some food for thought, especially for all of you well-intentioned souls out there trying to increase the Global North's concern for the billions of other human lives that exist in this World. Don't sacrifice people's humanity in an attempt to drum up sympathy.
No comments:
Post a Comment