Showing posts with label debate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label debate. Show all posts

Thursday, January 14, 2016

One Woman's Debate


Erin McCubbin (second from the left) participated in formal policy debate for four in high school, and four more at the collegiate level.  Three out of those four years, her partner and she competed at the NDT (think national championship for college debate).  Needless to say, she is a badass.  I asked her to reflect on the following question: How do you think being a woman influenced your experience as a policy debater?  Her amazing story follows.


Policy debate was fast. Being raised in an Italian­Yankee household taught me to speak quickly and loudly if I had an opinion. Policy debate was about the long game. The strategy and the partnership of it appealed to me. Growing up, my family read the paper together and talked about current issues at dinner. There was never a question in my mind that policy debate was the right path for me.

If you’ve ever been around me when the topic of policy debate came up, you know that I firmly believe that policy debate changed my life. Debate captivated me. It taught me that all voices need to be not just heard, but actively listened to. Debate showed me that trophies were shiny but the friendships forged through the late nights spent organizing expandos and perfecting that well­worn 2AC block never rusted. The conversations between rounds and outside of tournaments expanded my worldview in an undeniable way. Cross­country van rides perfected my ability to sleep in any situation and inoculated me against the smell of, well, everything.

But I did not learn those things in high school policy debate. Yes, I have friendships that 15 years later are still going strong from those times. But more often than not, I have painful memories of thinking I was never good enough.

“Policy debate is a man’s world. Why don’t you try IEs (individual events)?” As a girl raised with a ‘Girls Can Do Anything’ sign in her bedroom, I could not comprehend this statement. I remember staring back at my high school debate coach,­ a woman in her thirties at the time. Remorse fills me as I think about the potential mentor­-mentee relationship we could have shared. Instead, it was a competition from the start. Somewhere along the line, someone told her that she couldn’t cut it in the policy debate world and she listened. That choice, years later, would put me in the same pivotal conversation. Do I listen? She must be an expert since they pay her to coach, right?

Wrong. Thankfully, I didn’t listen. Instead, her confidence that I could not compete in policy debate strengthened my desire to do just that. By the end of high school, I reached Outstanding Distinction with the National Forensics League and had the opportunity to debate in college. While my high school coach tried to sabotage me along the way (in school suspension for borrowing a hairdryer on a debate trip from someone at another school comes to mind), I learned many valuable lessons. I had to manage my own time and preparation. I registered myself and my partner for debate tournaments. I learned how to pref judges and read brackets on my own. It was hard, but empowering. When new girls joined the team I mentored them instead of bullying them, regardless of which event they decided to compete in. Each time our coach told me that I couldn’t wear open toed shoes because they were distracting to the male judges or suggested that I only won a round because the college student judging thought I was attractive, I internalized it and moved on.

A coach from another local high school took me under her wing and showed me what it was like to have a coach on my side. I tried to model what she was to me to the younger girls on my team. Had it not been for her, I likely would have quit debate early on. She took my partner and I to tournaments when my coach couldn’t be bothered. She cheered me in every victory and, more importantly, in every defeat. She coached all of her debaters equally­­ and anyone who loved the activity as much as she did was ‘one of her debaters’.

Despite never traveling out of state and limited coaching, I made it to college debate on a substantial scholarship. College debate changed everything for me. My coaches were male and part of me was scared that it would be an amplified experience of my high school debate days. After my freshman year, I was even the only female on the debate team for a year. In those years, I was more loved, supported, and challenged than I ever thought possible. Once I got into college debate it was more about the craft than anything else; everyone who does policy debate in college is there for the same reason: the love of the game.

As a woman, of course my experience was a bit different than my male counterparts. Let me first say that I had many male and female mentors in the debate community during my college days. Nine times out of ten, the conversation after rounds was about my debating: arguments that could be improved, speaking pointers, compliments on my 2AC blocks or the 5 minutes of politics in the 1NR strategy. But there are always exceptions. My first debate tournament in college, a judge approached me after a round and told me I was cute. Not that I debated well. Not that I made a really great argument or spoke exceptionally clearly, but that I was cute. I could have had that experience anywhere: a conference, a work meeting, a party, or a concert. It didn’t phase me. It didn’t even really make me mad. In fact I laughed to myself, internalized it, and moved on. See, I learned that trick well in high school.

But I never once was forced to do anything against my will, or touched inappropriately. Never again did someone tell me I didn’t belong in a debate round because of my gender. I do not recall never feeling unsafe around other coaches or debaters. Many female debaters feel that they are categorized in two ways: a bitch or easy; girls that are all work and no play or girls that are all play. At least to my face, no one forced me into those boxes. I worked hard and said ‘no’ to lots of invitations, but I also made time to nurture my friendships in the community. Did I make social choices that I regret looking back? Sure. Did I learn something from them? Absolutely. Would I have made those same bad choices in some activity other than debate? Probably. Do I blame the debate community in any way? Hell no.

In a community that is so concerned with being concerned, we are hypersensitive to things like race, sexual orientation, gender, and ethnicity. We are more educated than many of our peers and with that great power comes great responsibility. I am sure that there are other people­ men and women­ in debate who have coaching staff, teammates, or peers who make them uncomfortable. That is an injustice that demands action and attention. It just wasn’t my experience.

My injustice was more subtle, but just as damaging. To this day, when something goes my way at work or professionally, I often wonder if it is because someone thinks I’m attractive. I second guess my competence and confuse it with luck. I kick myself if I laugh too much or smile too freely with a male co­worker because I worry that they will think I am flirting with them. My parents did not teach me this. And certainly neither did my friends in the debate community. My high school debate coach taught me this because, in some strange and twisted way, she was in competition with a high schooler. As women, in the debate community and in life in general, we must be kinder to one another. We must remember that when another woman succeeds it does not mean we failed.

Yes. I was participating in debate when my injustice happened. But it could have happened anywhere. Debate gave me the tools to process what happened to me. Debate showed me that there is more power in collaboration and love than there is in jealousy or selfishness. With these tools I can prevent myself from continuing the cycle and I can work to empower instead of demoralize. As a woman in a male­ dominated debate world, I learned skills many women struggle with. Compared to my female peers, I tend to be more vocal with my opinions because I am comfortable sharing them with anyone. I have confidence in my own ability to communicate, work with data, research, and handle tough questions. I learned these things earlier in life because of debate and because of these skills I have been able to seek out professional opportunities beyond my years.

Being a woman in debate who was bullied by another woman in a position of power changed me forever. I am slowly chipping away at my own self doubt, but in the meantime I find that I am consciously trying to be kinder and more supportive of other women in my professional life. I am aware of the potential pain of my actions may inflict and work to check my own biases wherever I can. Debate helped me process and learn from my own injustice, it did not cause it. Policy debate is not a man’s world just because there are more men in it. It is a world that belongs to every person who loves the craft. It is a world where kindness is cherished, opinions can be safely tested and crafted, and questions are encouraged. It is a world where the lessons translate into every aspect of our lives and make us better employees, spouses, and friends. It is a world that is constantly improving and will always strive to be better.

Monday, September 7, 2015

Debating for the 21st Century


four students participating in their first debate round EVER

Every year in late August or early September, around one hundred high school students and half as many adults gather to participate in a spectacle both terrifying and intriguing: a policy debate tournament.  More specifically, for the vast majority of the students it will be their first debate tournament

For as long as I can remember, a tournament has been organized at the beginning of the year to gently usher students into the world of competitive policy debate; in an age long past when I was competing, it was hosted by the Westminster Schools.  For the last three year, it's been run by the amazing people at Emory University's Barkley Forum, which functions as both a highly competitive college team (unquestionably one of the best in the nation) and as a service organization focused on bringing the benefits of debate to students from a wide range of socio-economic backgrounds.

Why, you might be wondering, do students require a "gentle" welcome to debating?  Why do entire organizations exist organized around promoting its practice?  Both excellent questions (good job you, you're so insightful!), and both can be answered by understanding the basic structure and expectations of policy debate.

Students work in teams of two, and compete in debates over the course of the year anchored by a single question, usually refereed to as the "topic" or "resolution" of the year.  Debate topics cover quite a range of policy areas, but they all have one thing in common - they consider what actions should or should not be taken by the United States Federal government.  This year's topic is:

Resolved: The United States Federal Government should substantially curtail its domestic surveillance.

Given this starting point question, students and coaches come up with particular policies that the government could enact that would be consistent resolution - passing the State Secrets Repeal Act, applying strict judicial scrutiny to police searches, or banning biometric scanners at airports, for instance.  Then, at tournaments, the students are obliged to debate both sides of the resolution (at least twice, sometimes three or four times), defending their own policy some rounds, trying to convince the judges that other students policies are a bad idea.

To convince judges, students construct an argument built on constant reference to high-quality scholarly sources and breaking news publications; they debate factual challenges, opportunity costs, unanticipated externalities, epistemological and philosophical questions, and even the meaning and parameters of the words that make up the resolution.  They do all of this under immense time pressure, speaking and listening at more than one hundred words per minute.  No kidding people, debate is like the Olympics for your brain, and students that get into this end up going to tournaments like this forty or fifty times over the course of their high school careers.

Those of you that aren't high school teachers like me might not spend as much time considering the structure of American education and how it evolves in response to the information environment of the new century, but it's a question that sorely needs considering.  A model of school that puts all its emphasis on the delivery of knowledge is laughably outdated - most students (particularly affluent students) walk around with access to a billion textbook's worth of information in their back pockets, and convincing them that they really need to dedicate mental energy to memorizing certain facts is a very hard sell.  The best case scenario is motivating most students through extrinsic fear of bad grades, which isn't going to inspire them to hold on to these tidbits for the rest of their lives.

And the truth is that at least to some extent, these students are right.  They shouldn't be spending huge amounts of time memorizing information.  They live in an era where the primary skill for success won't be knowledge acquisition, but rather information processing.  Students that can research well, that can listen to claims and assess for validity, that see into the agendas that exist behind the reams of information available on the internet - these are the students that will rise to the top in the twenty-first century.  

No activity can do more than policy debate to make you better at ALL of these things.

As I geared up for the first tournament of the year, I've been having conversations with my colleagues, and several times, after hearing what students experience while participating, the listener has told me "every student should do debate."  I couldn't agree more.